Personal Injury Law Firm in New York

AREAS OF PRACTICE

Recent New York Accident Injury Law Cases Ask Our Law Firm a Question

FREE CASE REVIEW

No Cost • No Obligation

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email

* Phone

() -

Street Address

Apartment

City

State

Zip Code

Date of Birth

Best method and time to contact you:

Describe your case:

Describe your case:

Date of Incident

I agree to the Terms & Conditions

I want to join the mailing list

* Type the verification code
in the box below:


RECENT NOTEWORTHY CASES | Back to List of Cases

 

Car crash led to spinal fusion, plaintiff alleged

1/16/2009
John LaCamera and Jennifer LaCamera v. Michael Bentivenga and Theresa Bentivenga, No. 18332/07

Settlement: $1,175,000

Court: Suffolk Supreme, NY

Judge: Paul J. Baisley, Jr.

Plaintiff Attorney(s):
Glenn Auletta, Gruenberg & Kelly, P.C., Ronkonkoma, NY

Defense Attorney(s):
John Persons, Montford, Healy, McGuire & Salley, Garden City, NY

Facts & Allegations:
At about 10 p.m. on Dec. 25, 2006, plaintiff Jennifer LaCamera, 27, a meat packer, was a passenger of a vehicle that was being driven by her husband, who was traveling on Arthur Kill Road, in Richmond County. While their vehicle was stopped at a red traffic signal, its rear end was struck by a trailing vehicle that was being driven by Theresa Bentivenga. Ms. LaCamera claimed that she sustained an injury of her back. Ms. LaCamera sued Bentivenga and the owner of Bentivenga’s vehicle, Michael Bentivenga. LaCamera alleged that Theresa Bentivenga was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. LaCamera further alleged that Michael Bentivenga was vicariously liable for Theresa Bentivenga’s actions. LaCamera’s counsel moved for summary judgment of liability, and the motion was granted. The matter proceeded to damages.

Injuries/Damages:
LaCamera claimed that she sustained a herniation of her L5-S1 intervertebral disc. She initially underwent conservative treatment, but her injury ultimately necessitated surgery that included a diskectomy, which involved the excision of her herniated disc, and fusion of her spine’s L5 and S1 levels. LaCamera claimed that she suffers a total, permanent, residual disability that prevents her resumption of work. She sought recovery of $1.7 million to $2.5 million for her future lost earnings. She also sought recovery of damages for her past and future pain and suffering. Her husband presented a derivative claim. Defense counsel contended that Ms. LaCamera did not sustain a serious injury, as defined by the no-fault law, Insurance Law § 5102(d). He claimed that her herniation was not a product of the accident, that she is not totally disabled and that she can resume work.

Result:
The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. The defendants’ insurer agreed to pay $1,175,000 from its $1.3 million policy. The money addressed Ms. LaCamera’s pain and suffering.